Learned Publishing calls for a discussion on how digital innovations affect research results and scholarly publishing practices, what benefits and challenges these innovations bring, as well as implications and recommendations for the best practice of the future. 

Authors of the article "DIAMAS deliverable: D3.1 IPSP Best Practices Quality assessment criteria, best practices, and assessment systems for Institutional Publishing Service Providers (IPSPs)" tried to summarize the existing quality assessment criteria, best practices, and evaluation systems developed by international associations, governments, and international databases.

The list of winning projects of the call "Science for the restoration of Ukraine in the war and post-war periods" 

Of course, due to the war, the results are not entirely reliable because of the limited data availability, but...
Ukraine is a developing innovator with an indicator of 31.0% of the EU average, with productivity below the average, and this gap is growing.

The Conference of Deans of French-Speaking Faculties of Medicine (La Conférence des doyens de médecine - CDD) and the National Council of Universities for Health Disciplines (Le Conseil national des universités pour les disciplines de santé - CNU Santé) have compiled a list of journals in which they recommend publishing the research results.

What is the future of academic publishing? This question (i.e., systemic issues, challenges, and opportunities) is answered by several scientists in the article "The future of academic publishing."